Collective Bargaining and Pay Inequity in the Public Sector Essay

Collective Bargaining and Pay Inequity in the Public Sector - test ExampleIn the United States at the moment majority of the states have passed legislations that permit workers to organise themselves and bargain collectively. This is because collective bargaining is a very authorised way through which employees can push for their rights considering the historical discrimination that has been witnessed in Americas public sector. The laws vary from state to state, for instance, only 12 states of altogether who have legalized collective recognise strikes are being legal. Those states not allowing strikes have outlined various processes for resolving issues in the workforce such as intermediation and fact-finding. A good number of states use interest arbitration where neutral arbitrators listen to grievances raised, evaluate facts, and follow statutory criteria to come up with decisions as to the price of collective bargaining agreements.Nonetheless, collective bargaining through uni onisation has become a very popular practice in America and the world over. Unions map out members in many different ways which include and not limited to lobbying for favourable labor laws such as protection of employees from arbitrary discharge, educating and training members on their rights and most importantly negotiating compensation directly with employers on behalf of the membership. Collective bargaining agreements also address issues of discrimination in the work place based on gender, race and even class hence attempt to force employers apply the same standards to every individual. AFSCME for instance, which is mostly concerned with women has for the past few decades managed to lobby against acquit inequity that is based on gender.One negative concern about trade unionism and collective bargaining agreements has been that they tend to indirectly further the variety gap. In particularly comes about when covered employees are